A Subsidiary Liability Claim Has Already Been Filed Against You
An insolvency administrator, creditor or other applicant is seeking to make you subsidiarily liable for the company’s debts.
DEFENSE OF DIRECTORS AND OWNERS
We defend directors, owners, beneficiaries and other controlling persons when bankruptcy proceedings include claims seeking to make them personally liable for the company’s debts. We analyze the application, the debtor’s documents, transactions and the causes of insolvency, prepare objections and represent the defense in Russian commercial courts.
WHEN DEFENSE IS NEEDED
An insolvency administrator, creditor or other applicant is seeking to make you subsidiarily liable for the company’s debts.
Your authority has already ended, but actions taken while you managed the debtor have become the subject of a bankruptcy dispute.
The applicant alleges that you effectively determined the company’s actions and should be liable for its obligations.
It is necessary to determine whether you actually had the ability to direct the debtor’s actions and what evidence the applicant relies on.
The applicant argues that the director should have filed the debtor’s bankruptcy petition with the Russian commercial court earlier.
Business decisions, payments, transfers of property or transactions completed before bankruptcy are being challenged.
The applicant relies on missing, incomplete or inaccurate debtor records and links this to the inability to satisfy creditor claims.
The court ruling, the deadline and the grounds for appeal or cassation review need to be assessed.
Nikolay NemkovManaging Partner, Konsultant Law Firm
Managing Partner’s Commentary
Why the defense should not begin with a general statement such as “I am not at fault,” but with a review of the specific legal grounds of the claim, the person’s role in the company, the causes of bankruptcy and the evidence relating to each disputed episode.
DEFENSE STRATEGY
In a subsidiary liability dispute, it is essential to identify the specific legal basis on which the applicant seeks to recover the company’s debts from a particular individual. The status of a controlling person, the alleged acts or omissions, causation, fault, statutory presumptions and the amount of potential liability must each be reviewed separately.
We examine the basis for alleging that the defendant could direct the debtor’s actions or make decisions binding on the company.
We identify the specific acts or omissions alleged by the applicant and the legal provision on which the claim relies.
We assess whether the evidence actually establishes that the alleged conduct caused the inability to satisfy creditor claims in full.
We analyze the applicant’s calculation and the legal basis used to determine the potential amount of liability.
We study the subsidiary liability application, bankruptcy court rulings, the insolvency administrator’s reports and the documents relied upon by the applicant.
We analyze formal authority, actual influence over the debtor’s operations and the circumstances the applicant relies on to establish control.
We review the company’s financial position, significant transactions, cash flows and circumstances that may have contributed to the bankruptcy.
We prepare the response and objections, organize the documents and determine which facts need to be established in court.
We participate in the hearing of the claim, present evidence, challenge the applicant’s arguments and file the necessary motions.
Where legally justified, we prepare an appeal or cassation complaint and represent the client during review of the court ruling.
The firm has been practicing since 2007. We handle litigation and complex legal matters for businesses in Krasnoyarsk, Moscow and other regions of Russia.
The bankruptcy of a legal entity does not automatically mean that its debts can be recovered from its director, owner or beneficiary. The dispute must establish the statutory grounds for imposing liability on the particular person.
At the same time, Russian bankruptcy law contains special presumptions and rules on the burden of proof. The defense therefore needs to address the specific allegations and evidence relied upon for each asserted ground, rather than respond to an abstract accusation.
The subsidiary liability application, bankruptcy court rulings and the documents on which the applicant relies.
We determine why the person is alleged to be controlling the debtor and what acts or omissions are attributed to them.
We identify documents and circumstances showing the defendant’s actual role, the economic rationale of business decisions and the causes of the company’s financial condition.
We prepare objections, evidence and an action plan based on the current stage of the court dispute.
MANAGING PARTNER

Managing Partner, Konsultant Law Firm
More than 20 years of practice in complex property and corporate disputes. Practicing insolvency practitioner.
A controlling person may be an individual or a legal entity that, during the period specified by law, had the ability to give the debtor binding instructions or otherwise determine its actions. The law establishes specific presumptions for directors, persons with decisive corporate participation and certain other situations. The court may also establish control based on other factual circumstances.
No. Holding the position of director does not automatically mean that the company’s entire debt can be recovered from that person. A director is among the persons for whom the law establishes a presumption of control, but subsidiary liability still requires the court to examine the relevant statutory ground and the circumstances of the specific case.
One of the principal grounds is provided by Article 61.11 of the Russian Bankruptcy Law: the inability to satisfy creditor claims in full as a result of acts or omissions of a controlling person of the debtor. A separate ground is provided by Article 61.12 for failure to file, or late filing of, the debtor’s bankruptcy petition where the statutory duty to file existed.
Yes. Acceptance of the application for consideration does not mean that the claim will be granted. The legal basis of the application must be reviewed and a full response, evidence and objections must be submitted regarding the circumstances relied upon by the applicant. The law contains special rules on the allocation of the burden of proof, so an incomplete or purely formal response can significantly complicate the defense.
As a general rule under Article 61.11 of the Russian Bankruptcy Law, the amount of liability is determined by reference to creditor claims that remained unpaid because the debtor lacked sufficient assets, subject to the statutory rules. The law also permits the amount to be reduced if it is proven that the harm caused by the particular person is substantially less than the amount claimed against them.
Interim measures may be imposed in subsidiary liability proceedings. The law expressly permits attachment of the property of the person against whom liability is sought, or other interim measures, where the relevant legal grounds exist and the court issues the appropriate ruling.
The court ruling, the date it was issued and received, the court’s reasoning and the case materials should be reviewed immediately. Court rulings imposing or refusing to impose subsidiary liability may be appealed. The next steps depend on the current court instance and the applicable procedural deadlines.
Describe your role in the company, who is seeking to make you subsidiarily liable and the current stage of the case. If an application has already been filed, include the bankruptcy case number and the date of the next court hearing.