A counterparty received goods or services but did not pay
Recovery of debts arising from supply, construction, service and other contractual obligations.
Business Disputes & Protection
We help recover debts arising from contracts, supplies, services and other obligations — from assessing recovery prospects to court proceedings and actually obtaining payment from the debtor.
We work across Russia. We represent creditors in court and at the enforcement stage.
Recovery of debts arising from supply, construction, service and other contractual obligations.
We review the legal basis, the amount owed and the documents confirming the obligation.
We document the debtor’s position and assess how to move the negotiations into a formal legal process.
We review the transfer of funds, repayment terms and evidence relating to the loan agreement.
We obtain the enforcement document and work toward actual enforcement of the judgment.
We assess whether interim measures and attachment of the debtor’s assets are appropriate.
We analyze the evidence, the debtor’s position and the prospects of actual recovery.
We calculate contractual penalties, interest for the use of another party’s funds and recoverable legal costs.
Nikolay NemkovManaging Partner, Konsultant Law Firm
What should be checked before starting recovery
Our Approach
A court judgment does not return the money by itself. Before filing a claim, we assess not only the legal prospects of the dispute but also where the awarded amount can actually be recovered from: the legal basis, evidence, the debtor’s position and its assets.
Court Practice
Bury LLC (ООО «Бурый») sought to reopen the judgment of 5 October 2022 ordering it to pay sole proprietor Aleksey Boykov (ИП Бойков Алексей Васильевич) RUB 3,938,309.80. On 1 November 2024, the court rejected the application. The earlier award was not set aside by this ruling.
The management company made partial payments for lift maintenance and repairs but did not settle the outstanding balance. The court ordered ООО УК «Содружество-Сервис» to pay ООО «Ритол» RUB 1,077,311.80 in principal debt and RUB 50,888 in court fee reimbursement, a total of RUB 1,128,199.80.
КПК «Совет» failed to return the client’s personal savings after the agreement expired. A formal demand produced no result. The court awarded the principal amount, contractual compensation and interest for late payment — RUB 546,433.28 in total.
The initial court decisions were set aside on cassation and the case was remitted for a new hearing. The client’s claims were increased to RUB 2.6 million and granted. The final result was upheld by the higher courts. The client actually received the awarded money.
In this debt recovery matter, the result was the client’s actual receipt of more than RUB 15 million.
In a debt recovery case, we obtained a judgment ordering the debtor to pay our client RUB 6.8 million.
View All Cases
The firm has been practicing since 2007. We handle litigation and complex legal matters for businesses in Krasnoyarsk, Moscow and other regions of Russia.
What Our Clients Say
Video testimonials, client letters and ratings on independent platforms.
Debt Recovery and Resolution of Complex Legal Issues
Related Practice: Debt Recovery
For a creditor, winning the dispute is not enough; what matters is whether the awarded amount can actually be recovered. We therefore assess recovery prospects not only from the contract and evidence, but also from the debtor’s position and the likely enforcement process.
Our task is not merely to obtain a court judgment, but to determine where the money can actually be recovered from.
Client Testimonial
Elena describes the recovery of a debt exceeding RUB 1.5 million. After the court judgment was obtained, the work continued during enforcement proceedings and, according to the client, the money was ultimately recovered from the debtor.
Debt Recovery Client
Debt Recovery Dispute
Elena describes the recovery of a debt exceeding RUB 1.5 million, including continued work during enforcement proceedings.
“The debt I had considered hopeless was ultimately recovered.”
Related Practice: Debt Recovery
Client Testimonial
Konstantin Arkhipenko
Konstantin Arkhipenko has been a client of Nikolay Nemkov for more than 10 years.
“When Nikolay was involved, there was a real opportunity to achieve a result and recover money from debtors.”
Konstantin Arkhipenko has known Nikolay Nemkov for more than 10 years. During that time, he has sought legal assistance on different matters, including employment disputes and the recovery of money from debtors.
For Konstantin, however, a long-term relationship with a lawyer is not limited to court proceedings. In his testimonial, he specifically recalls situations in which Nikolay Nemkov advised him not to start litigation.
This approach is fundamental to our work: a lawyer’s task is not to take every conflict to court, but first to determine which option genuinely serves the client’s interests.
Before proceedings begin, it is important to assess the evidence, the debtor’s financial position, the prospects of actual recovery and whether the legal costs make economic sense.
If litigation does not give the client a reasonable prospect of a useful result, that should be understood before time and money are spent.
“The entire process was clear, structured and easy to understand.”Discuss Debt Recovery
Who Works on the Matter

Managing Partner, Konsultant Law Firm
More than 20 years of practice in complex property and corporate disputes. Practicing insolvency practitioner.
The timing depends on the contract and applicable law. A pre-litigation procedure usually has to be completed first, after which a claim must be filed within the applicable limitation period. The prospects and timing in a particular matter are determined after the documents are reviewed.
In many cases, the law or the contract requires a formal pre-litigation demand, and the court may return the claim if that requirement has not been met. The form and timing of the pre-litigation procedure depend on the contract and the applicable legal rules.
Yes. As a rule, claims for contractual penalties and interest can be brought together with the principal debt. The calculation depends on the contract, the applicable rate and the period of delay; the final amount awarded is determined by the court.
If there are grounds to believe that the debtor is disposing of assets, interim measures may be considered, including attachment of property and restrictions on transactions. Whether such measures are necessary and available depends on the circumstances of the case.
A signed acceptance certificate is important, but it is not the only possible evidence. Performance of the obligation may also be confirmed by other documents and correspondence. The prospects depend on an assessment of the evidence as a whole.
After the judgment becomes enforceable, a writ of execution is issued and submitted for enforcement. Further steps depend on the debtor’s conduct and the assets available for enforcement.
The realistic prospects of enforcement should be assessed first, including the debtor’s assets, bank accounts, transactions and any available interim measures. If enforcement is objectively impossible, it is better to understand that before court proceedings begin.
Tell us who owes you money, how much is owed, how the debt arose and which documents confirm the obligation.
Send us the key documents. We will determine where the debt assessment should begin.